01
The site looks dated because the system is inconsistent
A reusable visual and content system replaces one-off page styling, making the redesign more coherent now and easier to extend later.
Remote delivery, wherever you are based. Existing URLs, content and search value are inventoried before anything is replaced.
A website redesign should do more than replace the visual layer. We review content, UX, mobile behaviour, platform constraints and technical SEO, then keep, improve, combine or replace what the evidence supports.
Diagram: the current site is audited into keep, improve and replace columns, then a redirect map leads to the new build and launch checks.
01
A reusable visual and content system replaces one-off page styling, making the redesign more coherent now and easier to extend later.
02
We revisit positioning, page hierarchy and calls to action so the new website represents the business you are running now.
03
Existing URLs, metadata, content value and inbound links are inventoried early. Redirects and post-launch checks are part of the migration plan.
The proposal confirms the exact inclusions. This list shows the areas that can form a complete engagement, not a promise that every project needs all of them.
A credible redesign begins by separating age from actual failure. Familiar URLs, useful content and working integrations may deserve to stay even when the interface does not.
01
Content, URLs and functionality that remain useful and supported by evidence.
02
Pages with clear value but weak structure, outdated copy or poor mobile presentation.
03
Thin or overlapping pages that compete with each other and make the site harder to navigate.
04
Platform or design decisions that prevent the site meeting current business, accessibility or performance needs.
Inventory routes, content, analytics supplied by you, technical constraints and search-sensitive pages.
Agree what stays, what moves and how important URLs and functions will be protected.
Test the direction on the pages and components that carry the most commercial or technical risk.
Validate redirects, forms, metadata, crawlability and responsive behaviour before and after go-live.
Often, yes. If the current platform can support the required content, accessibility, performance and editing workflow, improving it may be the lower-risk choice. A migration is recommended only when the constraints justify it.
The work starts with a route and content inventory. Valuable URLs and on-page topics are preserved where possible; changed URLs receive deliberate redirects; canonicals, metadata, internal links and the sitemap are tested around launch.
Yes, when the architecture allows it. A staged plan can prioritise the highest-value templates or journeys first, but the underlying design and content system still needs to be defined early so the stages fit together.
Analytics are useful when they are available and reliable, but they are not the only evidence. Search performance, support questions, sales feedback, content quality and direct usability review can also guide priorities.
Share the URL and the business reason behind the redesign. We will start by working out what is worth keeping.